<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom 2 Now Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peteashton.com/2008/07/lightroom_2_now_available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/07/lightroom_2_now_available/</link>
	<description>June 2000 to June 2010</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Murtagh</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/07/lightroom_2_now_available/comment-page-1/#comment-90105</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Murtagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2008/07/lightroom_2_now_available/#comment-90105</guid>
		<description>Lightroom 2 is fantastic, especially the local adjustments brush and the wonderful grad filters, whether it replaces photoshop is another question. My big wish is that all the old photoshop plugins would just slot effortlessly into Lightroom, I still end up exporting into PS if I need to use Black and White Pro...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lightroom 2 is fantastic, especially the local adjustments brush and the wonderful grad filters, whether it replaces photoshop is another question. My big wish is that all the old photoshop plugins would just slot effortlessly into Lightroom, I still end up exporting into PS if I need to use Black and White Pro&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: focalplane</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/07/lightroom_2_now_available/comment-page-1/#comment-89459</link>
		<dc:creator>focalplane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2008/07/lightroom_2_now_available/#comment-89459</guid>
		<description>I see that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/New_Lightroom_2DOT0_Refines_the_RAW_Image_Editor&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;review&lt;/a&gt; suggests Photoshop is basically obsolete.  Not really sure about that, which is why I &quot;struggle&quot; on with Photoshop 7 running under 10.4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/New_Lightroom_2DOT0_Refines_the_RAW_Image_Editor" rel="nofollow">review</a> suggests Photoshop is basically obsolete.  Not really sure about that, which is why I &#8220;struggle&#8221; on with Photoshop 7 running under 10.4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: focalplane</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/07/lightroom_2_now_available/comment-page-1/#comment-89443</link>
		<dc:creator>focalplane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2008/07/lightroom_2_now_available/#comment-89443</guid>
		<description>This is interesting.  I am in the middle of a 30 day trial with Aperture 2.1 and I have to say, as a Lightroom 1.2 user, I think Aperture has the edge.  Now Lightroom 2.0 comes along to mess around with my head!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting.  I am in the middle of a 30 day trial with Aperture 2.1 and I have to say, as a Lightroom 1.2 user, I think Aperture has the edge.  Now Lightroom 2.0 comes along to mess around with my head!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

