<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backgammon Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peteashton.com/2008/05/backgammon_question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/05/backgammon_question/</link>
	<description>June 2000 to June 2010</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/05/backgammon_question/comment-page-1/#comment-124140</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/?p=6701#comment-124140</guid>
		<description>@dan: Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dan: Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/05/backgammon_question/comment-page-1/#comment-124139</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/?p=6701#comment-124139</guid>
		<description>while playing standard backgammon, if I role a 4 and 3, can I move 1 token 4 spaces(land on my opponent knocking him out) and continue the same token 3 more spaces?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while playing standard backgammon, if I role a 4 and 3, can I move 1 token 4 spaces(land on my opponent knocking him out) and continue the same token 3 more spaces?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sue</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/05/backgammon_question/comment-page-1/#comment-62407</link>
		<dc:creator>sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 09:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/?p=6701#comment-62407</guid>
		<description>You have to take the three out. No choice, lah! That&#039;s the rules we&#039;ve always played by. Potentially keeps the game running a bit longer and adds to the fun. It seems to me this is a great game which relies on skill but also sometimes makes us the victim of fate. Just like life, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to take the three out. No choice, lah! That&#8217;s the rules we&#8217;ve always played by. Potentially keeps the game running a bit longer and adds to the fun. It seems to me this is a great game which relies on skill but also sometimes makes us the victim of fate. Just like life, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Strato</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/05/backgammon_question/comment-page-1/#comment-62253</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Strato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 14:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/?p=6701#comment-62253</guid>
		<description>Hi Pete,

It is perfectly legal in standard backgammon to move the checker in your home board. In this position, since your opponent has two checkers on the bar, if you take off a 3 from the 3 point, you will have two lone checkers (called blots) that can be hit and sent back, and you could lose the game.

There are about 50 different games you can play on a backgammon board, the rules in a few of them (i.e. Acey-Deucey) do actually say you may only remove checkers on points according to the exact numbers rolled on the dice, but not in standard backgammon. 

I hope this helps.

Michael Strato
Editor - www.GammonLife.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pete,</p>
<p>It is perfectly legal in standard backgammon to move the checker in your home board. In this position, since your opponent has two checkers on the bar, if you take off a 3 from the 3 point, you will have two lone checkers (called blots) that can be hit and sent back, and you could lose the game.</p>
<p>There are about 50 different games you can play on a backgammon board, the rules in a few of them (i.e. Acey-Deucey) do actually say you may only remove checkers on points according to the exact numbers rolled on the dice, but not in standard backgammon. </p>
<p>I hope this helps.</p>
<p>Michael Strato<br />
Editor &#8211; <a href="http://www.GammonLife.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.GammonLife.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikki</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/05/backgammon_question/comment-page-1/#comment-62242</link>
		<dc:creator>nikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 12:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/?p=6701#comment-62242</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Dubber and the computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Dubber and the computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dubber</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/05/backgammon_question/comment-page-1/#comment-62227</link>
		<dc:creator>Dubber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 11:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/?p=6701#comment-62227</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no expert, but my understanding was that the computer has it right. Casting out is generally desirable, but not compulsory. 

I often move so that a lower dice roll will guarantee a cast out, even when all my pieces are already home.

If I&#039;ve been making illegal moves, that&#039;s the first I&#039;ve heard of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no expert, but my understanding was that the computer has it right. Casting out is generally desirable, but not compulsory. </p>
<p>I often move so that a lower dice roll will guarantee a cast out, even when all my pieces are already home.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;ve been making illegal moves, that&#8217;s the first I&#8217;ve heard of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

