<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Microsoft are buying Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peteashton.com/2008/02/why_microsoft_are_buying_yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/02/why_microsoft_are_buying_yahoo/</link>
	<description>June 2000 to June 2010</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nunovo.org.uk</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/02/why_microsoft_are_buying_yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-37019</link>
		<dc:creator>nunovo.org.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2008/02/why_microsoft_are_buying_yahoo/#comment-37019</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Namechecking the cyber neighbours&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Namechecking the cyber neighbours</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monocat</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/02/why_microsoft_are_buying_yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-35981</link>
		<dc:creator>monocat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2008/02/why_microsoft_are_buying_yahoo/#comment-35981</guid>
		<description>Saul (at work) was saying that Yahoo has a bigger market shar out of the western world - and if that&#039;s the case - there&#039;s something in that for long term in emerging markets
also the way people use Google, as apposed to Yahoo is different - fleeting general searches or &#039;googling the answer&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saul (at work) was saying that Yahoo has a bigger market shar out of the western world &#8211; and if that&#8217;s the case &#8211; there&#8217;s something in that for long term in emerging markets<br />
also the way people use Google, as apposed to Yahoo is different &#8211; fleeting general searches or &#8216;googling the answer&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gadget</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/02/why_microsoft_are_buying_yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-35875</link>
		<dc:creator>gadget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2008/02/why_microsoft_are_buying_yahoo/#comment-35875</guid>
		<description>Google have around 75% of the search traffic so the others certainly need to do something. Ask have an interesting take on search results with their &#039;preview window&#039; idea but its not enough for me to change SE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google have around 75% of the search traffic so the others certainly need to do something. Ask have an interesting take on search results with their &#8216;preview window&#8217; idea but its not enough for me to change SE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: groc</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/02/why_microsoft_are_buying_yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-35628</link>
		<dc:creator>groc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 06:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2008/02/why_microsoft_are_buying_yahoo/#comment-35628</guid>
		<description>it just shows how stupid these dinosaurs are - instead of trying to be google they should concentrate on something else entirely and pour all their efforts into being the best at that. As far as i can see both microsoft and yahoo have been trying to be the *whole* internet in the one place - (old style AOL effectively) - but have ended up being very mediocre at everything they try. It&#039;s simply because they spread themselves too thin doing that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it just shows how stupid these dinosaurs are &#8211; instead of trying to be google they should concentrate on something else entirely and pour all their efforts into being the best at that. As far as i can see both microsoft and yahoo have been trying to be the *whole* internet in the one place &#8211; (old style AOL effectively) &#8211; but have ended up being very mediocre at everything they try. It&#8217;s simply because they spread themselves too thin doing that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/02/why_microsoft_are_buying_yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-35567</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2008/02/why_microsoft_are_buying_yahoo/#comment-35567</guid>
		<description>Actually, it&#039;s the market that is searching for graffiti on Birmingham blogs. A good quarter of the search traffic is after graf at the moment. 

I have no idea how valuable that demographic is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#8217;s the market that is searching for graffiti on Birmingham blogs. A good quarter of the search traffic is after graf at the moment. </p>
<p>I have no idea how valuable that demographic is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/02/why_microsoft_are_buying_yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-35566</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2008/02/why_microsoft_are_buying_yahoo/#comment-35566</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t that mean that MS already have a higher market share than the scumbags at Yahoo, at least in the market that is searching for Birmingham blogs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t that mean that MS already have a higher market share than the scumbags at Yahoo, at least in the market that is searching for Birmingham blogs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

