<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Succession Planning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peteashton.com/2008/02/succession_planning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/02/succession_planning/</link>
	<description>June 2000 to June 2010</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zenbullets</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/02/succession_planning/comment-page-1/#comment-41267</link>
		<dc:creator>zenbullets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2008/02/succession_planning/#comment-41267</guid>
		<description>The group blogging model works very effectively for Boing Boing, where there is a very well chosen team - spread in their disciplines but also united in theme. This model could work for CIB.

Regarding the motivation to contribute regularly - what&#039;s the money like? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The group blogging model works very effectively for Boing Boing, where there is a very well chosen team &#8211; spread in their disciplines but also united in theme. This model could work for CIB.</p>
<p>Regarding the motivation to contribute regularly &#8211; what&#8217;s the money like? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/02/succession_planning/comment-page-1/#comment-41085</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2008/02/succession_planning/#comment-41085</guid>
		<description>I must admit I&#039;m coming around to the idea of a group blog, partly because I don&#039;t just have CiB as my outlet. My personal stuff goes here including stuff about Brum. Impartial stuff goes there. 

One of my worries about bringing in a wider group of people is whether they have enough of a sense of ownership of the site to contribute regularly. Why shouldn&#039;t they just start their own blog? But if there&#039;s enough of a difference between CiB and a personal blog where both can thrive then it could work.

Regarding the assistant / apprentice thing I should add that one reason for looking at this is because it&#039;s an easy(ier) thing to get funded. Apparently. And I quite like the idea of Pete &amp; Stef&#039;s Excellent Blogging School. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit I&#8217;m coming around to the idea of a group blog, partly because I don&#8217;t just have CiB as my outlet. My personal stuff goes here including stuff about Brum. Impartial stuff goes there. </p>
<p>One of my worries about bringing in a wider group of people is whether they have enough of a sense of ownership of the site to contribute regularly. Why shouldn&#8217;t they just start their own blog? But if there&#8217;s enough of a difference between CiB and a personal blog where both can thrive then it could work.</p>
<p>Regarding the assistant / apprentice thing I should add that one reason for looking at this is because it&#8217;s an easy(ier) thing to get funded. Apparently. And I quite like the idea of Pete &#038; Stef&#8217;s Excellent Blogging School. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vigs</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/02/succession_planning/comment-page-1/#comment-41084</link>
		<dc:creator>Vigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2008/02/succession_planning/#comment-41084</guid>
		<description>Agree with dp - if CiB gets new input sources a group blog approach, with the right group could continue to keep it ear-pointingly good. 

I think Pete&#039;s somehow managed to act as a one-man-group in the initial phase of the site - covering a large area with impartiality, perhaps due to the partial learning curve that came with the job.

Perhaps a group with expertise in different areas of creativity could work - but allowing for more than one member in each area to stop funneling and projection of personal ideals of information, but still allowing for comment and debate. The difficulty in overseeing this project is the innate subjective approach we take to all things creative - words, images, people, so a mix of minds could be a solution. It could also be detrimental to the ethos pf the site without careful consideration given to selection of contributors.

That said, I think there are enough clued-up open talents who blog about creative issues and events in Birmingham to make it work and have the passion to succeed. There are plenty of bods who run blogs now, as either a part of their professional entities or as a personal account of their opinions, who could make this work.

I have to admit that I would find CiB a bit weird without the voice of Pete sluicing across the words, perhaps because he&#039;s become the sole voice in pulling together creativity in the area. And he&#039;s not afraid to get his hands dirty, rather than just talking about the whats, wheres and hows. But I do believe that CiB is still in its infancy, and that it&#039;s a resource to be cherished for all it stands for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with dp &#8211; if CiB gets new input sources a group blog approach, with the right group could continue to keep it ear-pointingly good. </p>
<p>I think Pete&#8217;s somehow managed to act as a one-man-group in the initial phase of the site &#8211; covering a large area with impartiality, perhaps due to the partial learning curve that came with the job.</p>
<p>Perhaps a group with expertise in different areas of creativity could work &#8211; but allowing for more than one member in each area to stop funneling and projection of personal ideals of information, but still allowing for comment and debate. The difficulty in overseeing this project is the innate subjective approach we take to all things creative &#8211; words, images, people, so a mix of minds could be a solution. It could also be detrimental to the ethos pf the site without careful consideration given to selection of contributors.</p>
<p>That said, I think there are enough clued-up open talents who blog about creative issues and events in Birmingham to make it work and have the passion to succeed. There are plenty of bods who run blogs now, as either a part of their professional entities or as a personal account of their opinions, who could make this work.</p>
<p>I have to admit that I would find CiB a bit weird without the voice of Pete sluicing across the words, perhaps because he&#8217;s become the sole voice in pulling together creativity in the area. And he&#8217;s not afraid to get his hands dirty, rather than just talking about the whats, wheres and hows. But I do believe that CiB is still in its infancy, and that it&#8217;s a resource to be cherished for all it stands for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dp</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2008/02/succession_planning/comment-page-1/#comment-40939</link>
		<dc:creator>dp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2008/02/succession_planning/#comment-40939</guid>
		<description>Group blog is worth trying. Particularly if it has a dedicated manager. Devolving responsibility for input to an ever increasing membership would allow the blog itself to become more of a portal. Out of that you could do a feature set of items. That would address the eventually unmanageable expansion of material and time that one person would handle. Think about what the Post have set up. A managed aggregate.

Your alternative, taking on an apprentice, might suit a lot of people, but I&#039;m thinking &#039;experienced&#039; bloggers would want their own voice/style. Which might be best addressed by, say, a group?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Group blog is worth trying. Particularly if it has a dedicated manager. Devolving responsibility for input to an ever increasing membership would allow the blog itself to become more of a portal. Out of that you could do a feature set of items. That would address the eventually unmanageable expansion of material and time that one person would handle. Think about what the Post have set up. A managed aggregate.</p>
<p>Your alternative, taking on an apprentice, might suit a lot of people, but I&#8217;m thinking &#8216;experienced&#8217; bloggers would want their own voice/style. Which might be best addressed by, say, a group?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

