<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Furtle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/</link>
	<description>This is my blog. There are many like it, but this one is mine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:06:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/comment-page-1/#comment-7308</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/#comment-7308</guid>
		<description>Footle? 

Ah, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.answers.com/topic/footle&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Footle&lt;/a&gt;. Right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Footle? </p>
<p>Ah, <a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/footle" rel="nofollow">Footle</a>. Right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jez</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/comment-page-1/#comment-7296</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 07:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/#comment-7296</guid>
		<description>Furtle is like footle, but slightly more active.   It&#039;s nothing to do with bimbling, which is ambulatory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Furtle is like footle, but slightly more active.   It&#8217;s nothing to do with bimbling, which is ambulatory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/comment-page-1/#comment-7221</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/#comment-7221</guid>
		<description>I think bimbling around the garden involves soft drugs, doesn&#039;t it? I&#039;d classify furtling as like rooting or farting -- crude in context, but equaly likely to be an any-activity word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think bimbling around the garden involves soft drugs, doesn&#8217;t it? I&#8217;d classify furtling as like rooting or farting &#8212; crude in context, but equaly likely to be an any-activity word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/comment-page-1/#comment-7219</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/#comment-7219</guid>
		<description>Pottering is somewhat more proactive. Like you&#039;re pottering &lt;i&gt;for&lt;/i&gt; something, however inconsequential. &quot;Pottering around the garden&quot; implies low-level weeding and tendering of roses. &quot;Bimbling around the garden&quot; could involve anything or nothing at all. &quot;Furtling around the garden&quot; should only be attempted with high walls and no overlooking windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pottering is somewhat more proactive. Like you&#8217;re pottering <i>for</i> something, however inconsequential. &#8220;Pottering around the garden&#8221; implies low-level weeding and tendering of roses. &#8220;Bimbling around the garden&#8221; could involve anything or nothing at all. &#8220;Furtling around the garden&#8221; should only be attempted with high walls and no overlooking windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marv</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/comment-page-1/#comment-7119</link>
		<dc:creator>Marv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/#comment-7119</guid>
		<description>Why bimble when you can potter?  

Your web site looks very nice now, by the way.  Almost like you found it in a skip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why bimble when you can potter?  </p>
<p>Your web site looks very nice now, by the way.  Almost like you found it in a skip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/comment-page-1/#comment-7114</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/#comment-7114</guid>
		<description>Smursh is easier to spell, although smursh itself is a smursh of smash and merge. It&#039;s all very.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smursh is easier to spell, although smursh itself is a smursh of smash and merge. It&#8217;s all very.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Shelton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/comment-page-1/#comment-7113</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Shelton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2007/06/furtle/#comment-7113</guid>
		<description>Your version makes a lot of sense but I think I&#039;d only ever thought of it before as pretty much a straight synonym for bimble (without the furtiveness). But if that&#039;s right then it&#039;s kind of superfluous as bimble&#039;s already there for that and doing a fine job. So you&#039;ve talked me round.

Also bravo for &quot;smursh&quot; rather than messing about with talk of &quot;portmanteau words&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your version makes a lot of sense but I think I&#8217;d only ever thought of it before as pretty much a straight synonym for bimble (without the furtiveness). But if that&#8217;s right then it&#8217;s kind of superfluous as bimble&#8217;s already there for that and doing a fine job. So you&#8217;ve talked me round.</p>
<p>Also bravo for &#8220;smursh&#8221; rather than messing about with talk of &#8220;portmanteau words&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
