Tree Quadtych 2

Posted on February 10, 2007 by Pete Ashton

Available in three flavours.

Tree Quadtych 2 AcidTree Quadtych 2 bwTree Quadtych 2 Xpro

Take your pick. (And let me know which one you like!)

Previous Quadtych

This entry was posted in Posts. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Tree Quadtych 2

  1. Dave C says:
    February 11, 2007 at 10:05 am

    B&W works best imho (but hey, what the bleep do i know?) :)

  2. Gary says:
    February 11, 2007 at 3:43 pm

    I really like the crossed processed one. The hint of colour gives it a nice washed out look.

  3. sally says:
    February 12, 2007 at 12:59 pm

    I also like the black and white one best……….stands out well

  4. Peta says:
    February 17, 2007 at 11:25 pm

    This is not a quadtych. A quadtych is a SERIES of 4 images (traditionally paintings, most commonly used as altar-pieces) This is a photograph with lines thru it. nice though

  5. Pete Ashton says:
    February 18, 2007 at 9:30 pm

    Sorry, I’m appropriating Quadtych to refer to four separate images which combine to form one. What you’re referring to I’d term a comic strip, or to be more accurate, fumetti.

    I’m pioneering an art-form in my own bubble and will warp the language to mine own purposes.

    So nurrr.

  6. Peta says:
    February 23, 2007 at 12:32 am

    But it’s not 4 separate images.

    But good work, er…. “pioneering”, anyway. Let us swing our mighty axes of pure pedantry…

    Raaaaa!

  7. Pete Ashton says:
    February 23, 2007 at 1:20 am

    Actually it is four separate images, in that I pointed and clicked the camera 4 separate times. ;)

    This one might make thing’s a bit clearer. 16 separate photos creating one:

    Unless you mean four images that are physically separate, in which case I’d agree with you if they were hanging on a wall, but I think digitally, where the black area is the “wall”, they could reasonably be considered to be separate even though they’re part of the same file.

    Pedantry is fun!

  8. Lewis says:
    February 25, 2007 at 6:36 pm

    Easy Pete. You seen the work of Ray Metzker (maybe Metzler, I’m away from me library)?… He “pioneered” a similar thing sometime back in the days of ye ole’ film cameras, using multi/exp. w/ varying exposure levels & identical framing of (usually night-time) urban landscapes. Might be stimulating for ya on some level (though that half-assed charlatan Billingham’s been ripping the idea recently…)

    Anyway, keep it up, hope all’s swell

    Mahalo