Kottke

And so Jason Kottke has announced he’s quit his job and is going to try blogging full time for the next year and, since he’s like an A-List blogger with seven years service, those who care for such things sit up and take notice. It’s an interesting one mainly because he’s not really doing anything out of the ordinary with his weblog. It’s about as tradblog as it gets. Most of the blogs that have made it “big” have done so because they’ve got a theme or a gimmick or they’re replicating some “normal” media thing in a blogging format, but Jason’s just blogging. Can he live off this? And if he does manage it, does it mean anything?

As usual I think it’s been blown out of all proportion. And I can kinda speak from experience because I did a similar thing a couple of years ago. When I quit my job and went to live on a farm for three months I was taking quite a risk. Admittedly my situation at that moment meant the risk didn’t feel that great but I needed help to do it, from friends driving the van that took my stuff into storage to my mate letting me borrow her room for a few weeks (thus saving rent money) to my family letting me stay with them rent-free when it was over, and many other favours small and large from many other people. I couldn’t have done it without them and I’m eternally grateful. And it strikes me Jason is doing the same thing, only whereas my network was based around my chums in the real world, his is based around a blogging community. Note the a blogging community. That’s important.

So often in this cyperspatial world of ours people confuse the pseudo-personal with the public. Understandably, because it’s all so terribly blurry, but confuse it they do. Jason Kottke may be the uber-blogger with the most hits but even though he has millions of readers he still only has a limited number of actual friends, and it’s those, the people who actually give a shit about whether he eats or not, who will help him achieve his goal. It might be nice to think that in our lovely interconnected internetty world strangers will help strangers, but they tend not to, at least not in any reliable monetary sense. But you can pretty much always rely on your friends to help and support you in your crazy decisions, because, without getting all soppy, that’s what they’re for.

So to the folk decrying Jason as an egotistical wanker, you’re kinda missing the point. He’s got this idea, that maybe the blogging medium can be something more than it current is without resorting to commercialisation, and he wants some help giving it a go, raising a pot of cash that will see him through it. And given the number of people he knows and, more importantly, has helped, who understand what he’s doing and why, I think he’ll reach that target.

I’m not one of them, I hasten to add, but if a good friend of mine had an interesting idea for a project that required he quit steady employment for a while, and if I could help in some way, chances are I would.

And that’s kinda the problem with this experiment. If it works and he is able to support himself through patronage then it’ll only prove that Jason Kottke is able to support himself through patronage. Yes, he’ll have developed a system by which to do it, but in order for it to work for you you’ll need to have a large established network of friends who understand what you’re up to and are able and willing to help. Maybe what you need is years of consistent work in the medium and a reputation for being a nice guy who tends to give more than he takes. Maybe that’s what the haters are so pissed off about.

This entry was posted in Posts. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Kottke

  1. Reinder says:

    Hmmm. Counter-example: Something Positive. I don’t think the people who paid Randy Milholland to quit his job were all part of his network of friends. Indeed the way in which he originally challenged people to pay his wages if they wanted their daily fix so bad suggested that they were not.

  2. Pete Ashton says:

    But that’s a comic and while I grant you there are thousands of webcomics out there meaning readers can come and go with ease, the dynamics are different, I think. You’ve got a definite “product” being pushed for a start along with a narative where you’re following a plot. What I find interesting about Kottke’s thing is he’s just blogging, not much more, not much less. For someone hooked on Something Postive, the next episode will be well worth paying for but for the next blog post? Probably not.

  3. brendadada says:

    So what are you saying won’t work? That he won’t stick out the year, that he won’t get people to sponsor him, or not enough, or something else? I really dunno, but it looks to me like kottke has a better chance than most of making this a goer. Have you seen how much exposure this has? I have 3 mails in this morning’s inbox about him, and you and everyothermother’sblog is talking about the lad. Did you know he has a monkey called, wait for it… Helpetica.. ? /me shudders.

  4. Pete Ashton says:

    No, I think he’ll do it, but it’ll only prove that he, or someone with a similar network, can do it, not that anyone can do it.

    I did it in a different context and people do this sort of stuff outside of blogging all the time, but I don’t think this is a model that can be spread to all blogs.

    Make sense?

  5. brendadada says:

    perfect sense, thank you. and I agree entirely fwiw :)

  6. brendadada says:

    Off at a slight tangent, I know, but have you seen this? More than $16k has already been donated to keep bunny out of the pie. Amazing.

  7. bee says:

    To be honest, if anyone can find a way of not working some lame job that doens’t include exploiting or stealing from the next guy then I wish them all the best and would like tips.
    There are a lot of authors paid to fill up bookshop shelves, it only makes sense to have more people who fill up the web getting paid.
    The rabbit killing blackmailing guy is a fool. No actually the people who donated money are some fools. Maybe I should threatten to rip up some pristine silver age comic unless people pay me £300, you think that would work?

  8. Pete Ashton says:

    “if anyone can find a way of not working some lame job that doens’t include exploiting or stealing from the next guy then I wish them all the best”

    That also occured to me with some of the comments in the MeFi post implying there was something wrong with not working a “normal” job to pay the bills. What is it with people who think if you’re not wage-slaving then you’re somehow evil and ripping off society?

  9. beez says:

    Word. I think I’m gonna become an evangelist for the American Dream, or at least a version where you get to do stuff for yourself and survive instead of small-cogging through your life. Thats my new phrase for the day then…

  10. brendadada says:

    small-cogging
    word indeed :)