<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Killing Comment Spam the Pete Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/</link>
	<description>This is my blog. There are many like it, but this one is mine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:06:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2568</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 01:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2568</guid>
		<description>First piece of Trackback spam appeared yesterday with another today. I notice on the bloggernet that others are attracting it too. since I don&#039;t use Trackback much if at all I might as well switch it off but it&#039;s a pisser for those who rely on it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First piece of Trackback spam appeared yesterday with another today. I notice on the bloggernet that others are attracting it too. since I don&#8217;t use Trackback much if at all I might as well switch it off but it&#8217;s a pisser for those who rely on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2567</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2567</guid>
		<description>Had an email from someone who was prevented from commenting by DBSL despite coming from a (currently) legit IP, so since the renaming of the comments script is working I&#039;&#039;ve removed the MT-DSBL plugin. We&#039;ll see what adverse effect this has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had an email from someone who was prevented from commenting by DBSL despite coming from a (currently) legit IP, so since the renaming of the comments script is working I&#8221;ve removed the MT-DSBL plugin. We&#8217;ll see what adverse effect this has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2566</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2566</guid>
		<description>Okay, changing the mt-comments.cgi scripts name works. 12 spam comments in 24 hours. That&#039;s down from a good couple of hundred. Whether it&#039;s still working in a week remains to be seen.

This is speculation, but I think I&#039;ve eliminated the spammers who just hit the script indiscriminately and am only getting those who are &quot;visiting&quot; the page itself, which means they&#039;re going via google, which means they&#039;re not going to hit the more recent posts (see 3rd paragraph above).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, changing the mt-comments.cgi scripts name works. 12 spam comments in 24 hours. That&#8217;s down from a good couple of hundred. Whether it&#8217;s still working in a week remains to be seen.</p>
<p>This is speculation, but I think I&#8217;ve eliminated the spammers who just hit the script indiscriminately and am only getting those who are &#8220;visiting&#8221; the page itself, which means they&#8217;re going via google, which means they&#8217;re not going to hit the more recent posts (see 3rd paragraph above).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2565</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 04:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2565</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kahunaburger.com/blog/archives/000189.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Spamassasin&lt;/a&gt; seems too good to be true, which might explain why I haven&#039;t tried it. If the renaming trick fails (still holding up 5 hours later) I&#039;ll give it a go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kahunaburger.com/blog/archives/000189.html" rel="nofollow">Spamassasin</a> seems too good to be true, which might explain why I haven&#8217;t tried it. If the renaming trick fails (still holding up 5 hours later) I&#8217;ll give it a go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2564</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 04:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2564</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to use this comment thread to list my comment spam battles rather than clog up the blog itself with such triffles. 

Today I tried the &quot;rename mt-comments.cgi&quot; trick which I hadn&#039;t done before mainly because it seemed too simple. 

Three hours in and not one spam. 

Wow.

Details a third of the way down &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.elise.com/mt/archives/000246concerning_spam.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt;

In the long term I&#039;m sure it&#039;ll be compromised (if you view the source of the comments form it&#039;s in there) but it only took a minute to do, which is quicker than deleting spams held for moderation. I&#039;m guessing that a rename every few days should do the trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to use this comment thread to list my comment spam battles rather than clog up the blog itself with such triffles. </p>
<p>Today I tried the &#8220;rename mt-comments.cgi&#8221; trick which I hadn&#8217;t done before mainly because it seemed too simple. </p>
<p>Three hours in and not one spam. </p>
<p>Wow.</p>
<p>Details a third of the way down <a href="http://www.elise.com/mt/archives/000246concerning_spam.php" rel="nofollow">this page</a></p>
<p>In the long term I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;ll be compromised (if you view the source of the comments form it&#8217;s in there) but it only took a minute to do, which is quicker than deleting spams held for moderation. I&#8217;m guessing that a rename every few days should do the trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2563</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2563</guid>
		<description>Okay, I&#039;ve had two pieces of comment spam on my most recent entry in the last 24 hours. Now I&#039;ve had hundreds of attempts to spam my in that time so two isn&#039;t terrible, but it&#039;s worse than none, and it&#039;s my most recent post. That ain&#039;t supposed to happen. Looks like the battle is shifting again. Cunts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;ve had two pieces of comment spam on my most recent entry in the last 24 hours. Now I&#8217;ve had hundreds of attempts to spam my in that time so two isn&#8217;t terrible, but it&#8217;s worse than none, and it&#8217;s my most recent post. That ain&#8217;t supposed to happen. Looks like the battle is shifting again. Cunts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reinder</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2562</link>
		<dc:creator>Reinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2562</guid>
		<description>It turns on that the survival time of a bare MT. 3.14 install on my host isn&#039;t long enough to configure MT-Blacklist. *That* is irony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It turns on that the survival time of a bare MT. 3.14 install on my host isn&#8217;t long enough to configure MT-Blacklist. *That* is irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2561</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2561</guid>
		<description>Nah, it&#039;s not one of the ones I get. The basic structure is there but it&#039;s all in the rhythm. It&#039;s like sniffing a fine wine. It might well be a genuine cut-n-paste of a spam, but it wasn&#039;t sent by a robot because it&#039;s all on its own. 

Plus it was on here within hours. I have never, in all the months I&#039;ve been swamped by these bastards, seen one come to a post that quickly. 

I refer you to the third comment &lt;a&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;...

Of course, since my defence is pretty much based on them not hitting new posts, now would be the perfect time for them to change that tactic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, it&#8217;s not one of the ones I get. The basic structure is there but it&#8217;s all in the rhythm. It&#8217;s like sniffing a fine wine. It might well be a genuine cut-n-paste of a spam, but it wasn&#8217;t sent by a robot because it&#8217;s all on its own. </p>
<p>Plus it was on here within hours. I have never, in all the months I&#8217;ve been swamped by these bastards, seen one come to a post that quickly. </p>
<p>I refer you to the third comment <a>here</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>Of course, since my defence is pretty much based on them not hitting new posts, now would be the perfect time for them to change that tactic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reinder</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2560</link>
		<dc:creator>Reinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2560</guid>
		<description>I do see a lot of comment spams that look like that (generic compliment plus unrelated URL). 
However, looking at the website linked, it&#039;s, uhm.... odd. It&#039;d be a lot of work to play a prank on one weblog, but I suppose if the prankster wanted to tweak a lot of people, it&#039;d be worth the trouble to make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do see a lot of comment spams that look like that (generic compliment plus unrelated URL).<br />
However, looking at the website linked, it&#8217;s, uhm&#8230;. odd. It&#8217;d be a lot of work to play a prank on one weblog, but I suppose if the prankster wanted to tweak a lot of people, it&#8217;d be worth the trouble to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2559</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2559</guid>
		<description>I was going to neuter it but realised that with no-follow I don&#039;t need to anymore. The joke remains.

And it is a joke - I&#039;ve never seen a comment spam with that pattern to it before, and I know one when I see one. Nice try though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to neuter it but realised that with no-follow I don&#8217;t need to anymore. The joke remains.</p>
<p>And it is a joke &#8211; I&#8217;ve never seen a comment spam with that pattern to it before, and I know one when I see one. Nice try though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2558</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2558</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s gotta be a hoax, damn you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s gotta be a hoax, damn you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: groc</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2557</link>
		<dc:creator>groc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2557</guid>
		<description>Giggle.
oh the irony.
oh the hubris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giggle.<br />
oh the irony.<br />
oh the hubris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reinder</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2556</link>
		<dc:creator>Reinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2556</guid>
		<description>Looks like one comment spam got through right here :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like one comment spam got through right here :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara June</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2555</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara June</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2555</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You surely have one of the most interesting sites in net. I believe in your way of doing, so go on this way. It’ surely the right way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: groc</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2554</link>
		<dc:creator>groc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2554</guid>
		<description>it sez here:

*   CHANGES IN v2.02

+   Fixed critical &quot;delete a weblog, lose a second for free&quot; bug

as I wade thru the mt-blacklist readme trying to understand how I&#039;m supposed  to install the stupid thing.

think I might go over to blogger or something else at the moment. this ain&#039;t worth the headaches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it sez here:</p>
<p>*   CHANGES IN v2.02</p>
<p>+   Fixed critical &#8220;delete a weblog, lose a second for free&#8221; bug</p>
<p>as I wade thru the mt-blacklist readme trying to understand how I&#8217;m supposed  to install the stupid thing.</p>
<p>think I might go over to blogger or something else at the moment. this ain&#8217;t worth the headaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/comment-page-1/#comment-2553</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashton.com/2005/01/killing_comment_spam_the_pete_way/#comment-2553</guid>
		<description>Oh, just for the record, I&#039;m not using TypeKey or any authorisation system, I&#039;m not moderating at all on those posts younger than 21 days and I&#039;m not requiring email addresses from commenters. People can use HTML in their comments as much as they like and no-one will be blocked on those new posts unless they&#039;re in the Blacklist list. There are no barriers to communication in my comments system at all. 

Nice, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, just for the record, I&#8217;m not using TypeKey or any authorisation system, I&#8217;m not moderating at all on those posts younger than 21 days and I&#8217;m not requiring email addresses from commenters. People can use HTML in their comments as much as they like and no-one will be blocked on those new posts unless they&#8217;re in the Blacklist list. There are no barriers to communication in my comments system at all. </p>
<p>Nice, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
